<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Info About HAFA Short Sales</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infoabouthafashortsales.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infoabouthafashortsales.com</link>
	<description>HAFA Short Sales Info for Home Sellers from California Short Sale Lawyer Ronald Ballard</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 23:27:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>HAFA Basics</title>
		<link>http://infoabouthafashortsales.com/2010/04/hafa-basics/</link>
		<comments>http://infoabouthafashortsales.com/2010/04/hafa-basics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Ballard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infoabouthafashortsales.com/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 4, 2010 the United States federal government began implementation of the &#8220;Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives&#8221; (HAFA) program. This was promoted by the Obama Administration as a way to encourage short sales. In reality, it will not be effective and it&#8217;s usually worse for a homeowner who is facing a signficant hardship when compared to a traditional short sale. As [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On April 4, 2010 the United States federal government began implementation of the &#8220;Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives&#8221; (HAFA) program. This was promoted by the Obama Administration as a way to encourage short sales. In reality, it will not be effective and it&#8217;s usually worse for a homeowner who is facing a signficant hardship when compared to a traditional short sale. As one sees below, it is more beneficial for the bank than for the homeowner. A few key reasons are:</p>
<ol>
<li>Homeowners who likely were not making payments due to hardship must pay 31% of their gross income to participate in the program or agree to give their property to the bank by a &#8221;deed in lieu&#8221; of foreclosure.</li>
<li>The bank determines the sales price. Neither the homeowner nor their broker have any control or influence over pricing.</li>
<li>The bank can force a deed in lieu if the property does not sell at IT’s price in 120 days, even if the property is not in foreclosure.</li>
<li>Even if the program was good, it covers very few loans: not Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA and VA loans.</li>
<li>It only affect a first mortgage/deed of trust. The homeowner is responsible for negotiation of their own junior liens (if any). The program allows up to 6% of each lien balance to be paid, with a maximum payment of $6,000 for ALL liens.</li>
</ol>
<p>The homeowners&#8217; benefit is a $3,000 incentive payment IF the sale closes. This presumably helps with moving costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://infoabouthafashortsales.com/2010/04/hafa-basics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

